You get what you praise for. Finding praiseworthy actions is the key to improving your canvassers effectiveness. Anything that can be interpreted as criticism will discourage volunteers from returning and is less likely to lead to a more effective canvass. Praising actions will lead to positive actions displacing negative ones. Commit-To-Vote forms make it easy to find ways to praise your canvassers. In this post, we will discuss how to find actions to praise in the walk lists themselves. This can be useful for canvassers who brought back only a couple (or zero) Commit-To-Vote forms as well as in canvasses that do not involve Commit-To-Vote forms at all. As always, I focus on canvassing to identify Democrats and motivate them to vote.
You get what you praise for. Hence if you simply count how many 1s (aka strong support for your candidate) you find on the walk lists, you may inadvertently encourage canvassers to mark all voters at a household as a 1 even if they haven’t spoken to them. Instead consider focusing first on a household where the voters are not all marked identically on the walk list. Consider saying: “At this household you made different notations for each voter. I like to see that. Do you remember how that conversation went?” Even if that was simply a mistake on their part, you have made your point without seeming to criticize them.
If at most (or even all) households all voters are marked identically, consider asking them to count each household as just one contact. Something like: “Where there are multiple voters at a household, could you count that as just one contact unless you are quite sure that you spoke to more than one of the voters on the list?” Tone of voice here is everything. If you can’t make this sound like you are asking them to do a special favor for you (and hence not criticism), don’t do it.
If on a given walk list, only one or two households have support information about more than one voter, that suggests that something different happened at those households. I would still ask first about a household where the voters are not all marked identically on the walk list, as mentioned above. This reinforces the value that you place on treating voters individually. Then pivot to one where more than one voter (preferably just two voters) is marked as being a supporter and ask about that household. Delay your praise until you know what happened. If they say that they talked to both voters, praise that. If they say that Jane told them that John would support your candidate, try: “Terrific, we are pleased to have John’s support. And next time you don’t need to record that because we try to respect each individual’s independence by recording only what they tell us themselves.” If they say that they just assumed that John would support us because Jane does. Try: “That makes sense. He probably will. And next time don’t need to record that … “
After a given volunteer is consistently recording information only about the voters from whom they have heard directly, you can start to talk to them about the value of talking to multiple voters at the same household. You can do this by focusing on any household where they have clearly spoken to more than one voter. If they never mark more than one voter, they probably aren’t asking to speak to more than one voter. Consider: “Wow you are doing a great job here. I like that you are recording information only about the voters to whom you have spoken. Would you be interested in my thoughts on how to speak to more than one voter at a household?”
This post assumes that this canvass is focused primarily on identifying supporters. If your campaign is focused on other aspects, please adjust accordingly. It also assumes that you want canvassers to mark as supporters only voters to whom the canvasser has spoken directly. This may not be the case for all campaigns.
In any case, keep it positive and remember that you get what you praise for.


